XML Print


1- Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India , mohitchohil@gmail.com
2- Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India
Abstract:   (882 Views)
Background: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) represents a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative malignancies with unique presentation and treatment response. This study was intended to assess the histomorphology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and correlate with clinicopathological and immunohistochemical findings.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on all specimens diagnosed as NHL by histopathological analysis, with immunohistochemical correlation in the pathology department, for two years. Clinical details such as age, gender, site of the lesion, and Nodal / extranodal presentation were recorded. Histopathological analysis was performed, and Immunohistochemical (IHC) reports were obtained. Further histopathological findings were correlated with IHC results. Statistical analysis was done based on the frequency distribution.
Results: This study includes 48 cases. Most cases are 61 to 70 years old, with a male predominance (56.25 %). The most common clinical diagnosis was lymphoma (79.17 %).  Most of the lesions were of lymph nodal origin (60.42 %). The cervical group (35.42 %) is the most common lymph node affected, followed by the axillary nodes. The most common extranodal sites are the retroperitoneum and stomach. On histopathological evaluation, the most common diagnosis was NHL (68.75 %) without further subtyping. Among cases where subtyping was done, the most common lesion were follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). On IHC evaluation, B cell neoplasms (85.42%) were common compared to T cell neoplasms (14.58 %). The most common subtype was DLBCL (52.08 %), followed by follicular lymphoma (16.67 %).
Conclusion: Our study found diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as the most common type of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Cervical lymph nodes were found to be the most common site of involvement. But the involvement of rare sites like the testis and palate was also found. Hence the probability of NHL in these rare sites should always be considered.

 
Full-Text [PDF 535 kb]   (295 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (13 Views)  
Research Article: Original Paper | Subject: Pathology
Received: 2023/03/30 | Accepted: 2023/05/22

References
1. Roy A, Kar R, Basu D, Badhe BA. The spectrum of histopathologic diagnosis of lymph node biopsies: A descriptive study from a tertiary care center in South India over 5½ years. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2013; 56(2): 103. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Harris NL, JaffesES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Cleary ML, et al. A revised European American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 1994; 84: 1361-92 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Gupta V, Singh S, Bhatia Y. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an immunohistochemical analysis with clinicopathological correlation. International Journal of Current Research. 2018; 10(08): 72350-55. [View at Publisher]
4. Yeole BB. Trends in the incidence of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008; 9(3): 433-6. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin,2005; 55(2):74-108. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Krenacs L, Bagdi E, Krenacs T. Bancroft Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 5th ed. Nottingham. Immunocytopathology of Lymphomas; 517-35
7. Sharma M, Mannan R, Madhukar M, Navani S, Manjari M, Bhasin TS, et al . Immunohistochemical (IHC) Analysis of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Spectrum According to WHO/REAL Classification: A Single Centre Experience from Punjab, India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2014; 8(1): 46-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Altieri A, Bermejo JL, Hemminki K. Familial risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other lymphoproliferative malignancies by histopathologic subtype: the Swedish Family-Cancer Database. Blood. 2005; 106(2): 668-72 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Chang KL, Arber DA, Weiss LM. Lymph nodes and spleen. In: Wick MR, Livolsi VA, Pfeifer JD, Stelow EB, Wakely PE, (eds.) Silverberg's Principles and Practice of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology. 5th ed. Philedelphia, PA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone,2015.719- 60.
10. Akhter A, Rahman MR, Majid N, Shermin S, Saleheen MS, Rajib RC, et al. Histological Subtypes of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Different Age and Sex Groups. Bangladesh Med J. 2012; 41(1):32-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Higgins RA, Blankenship JE, Kinney MC. Application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2008; 132(3): 441-61. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Kalyan K, Basu D, Soundararaghavan J. Immunohistochemical typing of nonHodgkin's lymphoma-comparing working formulation and WHO classification. Indian J PatholMicrobiol. 2006; 49(2): 203-7. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Morton LM, Wang SS, Devesa SS, Hartge P, Weisenburger DD, Linet MS. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992- 2001. Blood. 2006; 107(1): 265-76. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Vallabhajosyula S, Baijal G, Vadhiraja B M, Fernandes DJ, Vidyasagar M S. NonHodgkin's lymphoma: Is India ready to incorporate recent advances in day-to-day practice? J Can Res Ther. 2010; 6: 36-40. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Padhi S, Paul TR, Challa S, Prayaga AK, Rajappa S, Raghunadharao D, et al. Primary Extra Nodal Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A 5 Year Retrospective Analysis. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13(10): 4889-95. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Borgohain M, Krishnatreya K, Weingken C, Das J. Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemistry in Lymphoma. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2020; 4(12): 162-64. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
17. Aggarwal D, Gupta R, Singh S, Kudesia M. Comparison of working formulation and REAL classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an analysis of 52 cases. Hematology. 2011; 16(4): 195-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Naresh KN, Srinivas V, Soman CS. Distribution of various subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in India: a study of 2773 lymphomas using R.E.A.L. and WHO Classifications. Ann Oncol. 2000; 11(1): 63-7 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Nair R, Arora N, Mallath MK. Epidemiology of NonHodgkin's Lymphoma in India. Oncology. 2016; 91(1):18-25. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Mushtaq S, Akhtar N, Jamal S, Mamoon N, Khadim T, Sarfaraz T, et al. Malignant lymphomas in Pakistan according to the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008; 9(2): 229-32. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.