1- Food, Drug and Natural Products Health Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- School of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
3- Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,masoud.am70@gmail.com
2- School of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
3- Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (1182 Views)
Background: Essential oils derived from medicinal plants have attracted increasing attention as natural alternatives to synthetic antimicrobial agents, especially in food safety and preservation. Urtica dioica (nettle) and Malva spp. (mallow) are traditionally known for their medicinal properties, yet their combined antibacterial effects remain underexplored. This study investigated the in vitro antibacterial activity of nettle and mallow essential oils, both individually and in combination (1:1 ratio), against ten common foodborne pathogens responsible for spoilage and contamination.
Methods: Essential oils were extracted from U. dioica and Malva spp., then tested alone and in a 1:1 (v/v) combination for their antibacterial efficacy using agar disk diffusion and broth microdilution assays. The tested bacterial strains included Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, Alcaligenes faecalis, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella dysenteriae, Listeria monocytogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli. Gentamicin (10 µg/disk) was used as a positive control. Data were analyzed to calculate the inhibition zone diameter (DIZ), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). All experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3), and results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to compare differences among treatment groups.
Results: All essential oil formulations showed antibacterial activity, with MIC values for nettle essential oil (NEO) ranging from 1,250 to 5,000 µg/mL and for mallow essential oil (MEO) from 2,500 to 10,000 µg/mL. The 1:1 combination of NEO and MEO retained NEO’s favorable MIC and delivered a lower MBC for K. pneumoniae compared to MEO alone. Across strains, MIC differences were not uniformly significant. For L. monocytogenes, NEO showed equal MIC and MBC (1,250 µg/mL), indicating its bactericidal activity.
Conclusion: Nettle and mallow essential oils possess significant antibacterial activity against key foodborne pathogens. Their simultaneous application yielded additive effects against some pathogens. These findings support the potential of these essential oils as natural antimicrobial agents to be used in food preservation systems, including for antimicrobial packaging and as edible coatings or surface sanitizers.
Methods: Essential oils were extracted from U. dioica and Malva spp., then tested alone and in a 1:1 (v/v) combination for their antibacterial efficacy using agar disk diffusion and broth microdilution assays. The tested bacterial strains included Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, Alcaligenes faecalis, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella dysenteriae, Listeria monocytogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli. Gentamicin (10 µg/disk) was used as a positive control. Data were analyzed to calculate the inhibition zone diameter (DIZ), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). All experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3), and results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to compare differences among treatment groups.
Results: All essential oil formulations showed antibacterial activity, with MIC values for nettle essential oil (NEO) ranging from 1,250 to 5,000 µg/mL and for mallow essential oil (MEO) from 2,500 to 10,000 µg/mL. The 1:1 combination of NEO and MEO retained NEO’s favorable MIC and delivered a lower MBC for K. pneumoniae compared to MEO alone. Across strains, MIC differences were not uniformly significant. For L. monocytogenes, NEO showed equal MIC and MBC (1,250 µg/mL), indicating its bactericidal activity.
Conclusion: Nettle and mallow essential oils possess significant antibacterial activity against key foodborne pathogens. Their simultaneous application yielded additive effects against some pathogens. These findings support the potential of these essential oils as natural antimicrobial agents to be used in food preservation systems, including for antimicrobial packaging and as edible coatings or surface sanitizers.
Keywords: Antibacterial activity, Nettle, Urtica, Mallow (Althaea), Malva, Essential oils (Oils, Volatile), Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) (Microbial Sensitivity Tests), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), Phytomedicine
Type of Article: Original article |
Subject:
Molecular Sciences
Received: 2025/07/13 | Accepted: 2025/09/28
Received: 2025/07/13 | Accepted: 2025/09/28
References
1. Akinsemolu AA, Onyeaka HN. Microorganisms Associated with Food Spoilage and Foodborne Diseases. in Smith J, Brown K, editors. Food safety and quality in the global South. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 489-531. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Elbehiry A, Abalkhail A, Marzouk E, Elmanssury AE, Almuzaini AM, Alfheeaid H, et al. An overview of the public health challenges in diagnosing and controlling human foodborne pathogens. Vaccines. 2023;11(4):725. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Pinto L, Tapia-Rodríguez MR, Baruzzi F, Ayala-Zavala JF. Plant antimicrobials for food quality and safety: Recent views and future challenges. Foods. 2023;12(12):2315. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Deshmukh RK, Gaikwad KK. Natural antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds for active food packaging applications. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2024;14(4):4419-40. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Oulahal N, Degraeve P. Phenolic-rich plant extracts with antimicrobial activity: an alternative to food preservatives and biocides? Front Microbiol.
2022;12:753518. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Fathi M, Ghane M, Pishkar L. Phytochemical composition, antibacterial, and antibiofilm activity of Malva sylvestris against human pathogenic bacteria. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2022;17(1):114164. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Jan KN, Zarafshan K, Singh S. Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.): a reservoir of nutrition and bioactive components with great functional potential. Journal of food measurement and Characterization. 2017;11(2):423-33. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Hossain TJ. Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations. Eur J Microbiol Immunoln. 2024;14(2):97-115. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Raeisi M, Mohammadi MA, Coban OE, Ramezani S, Ghorbani M, Tabibiazar M, et al. Physicochemical and antibacterial effect of Soy Protein Isolate/Gelatin electrospun nanofibres incorporated with Zataria multiflora and Cinnamon zeylanicum essential oils. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2021;15(2):1116-26. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Hulankova R. Methods for Determination of Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils In Vitro-A Review. Plants. 2024;13(19):2784. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Aman Mohammadi M, Ramezani S, Hosseini H, Mortazavian AM, Hosseini SM, Ghorbani M. Electrospun antibacterial and antioxidant zein/polylactic acid/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose nanofibers as an active food packaging system. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2021;14:1529-41. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Gülçin I, Küfrevioglu OI, Oktay M, Büyükokuroglu ME. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiulcer and analgesic activities of nettle (Urtica dioica L.). J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;90(2-3):205-15. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Barros L, Carvalho AM, Ferreira IC. Leaves, flowers, immature fruits and leafy flowered stems of Malva sylvestris: a comparative study of the nutraceutical potential and composition. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(6):1466-72. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Barros L, Carvalho AM, Ferreira IC. Leaves, flowers, immature fruits and leafy flowered stems of Malva sylvestris: a comparative study of the nutraceutical potential and composition. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(6):1466-72. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Kalemba D, Kunicka A. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oils. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10(10):813-29. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Langeveld WT, Veldhuizen EJ, Burt SA. Synergy between essential oil components and antibiotics: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2014;40(1):76-94. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Nestor Bassolé IH, Juliani HR. Essential Oils in Combination and Their Antimicrobial Properties. Molecules. 2012;17(4):3989-4006. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Inguglia ES, Song Z, Kerry JP, O'Sullivan MG, Hamill RM. Addressing clean label trends in commercial meat processing: Strategies, challenges and insights from consumer perspectives. Foods. 2023;12(10):2062. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Tomić A, Šovljanski O, Erceg T. Insight on incorporation of essential oils as antimicrobial substances in biopolymer-based active packaging. Antibiotics. 2023;12(9):1473. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Andrade-Ochoa S, Chacón-Vargas KF, Sánchez-Torres LE, Rivera-Chavira BE, Nogueda-Torres B, Nevárez-Moorillón GV. Differential Antimicrobial Effect of Essential Oils and Their Main Components: Insights Based on the Cell Membrane and External Structure. Membranes (Basel). 2021;11(6):405. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Du J, Fu J, Chen T. Investigation of the Antibacterial Properties and Mode of Action of Compounds from Urtica dioica L. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e52083. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Ali MR, Ibrahim HH, Salah-Eldin AA. Unveiling the chemical composition, bioactive profile and antioxidant capacity of dried egyptian jew's mallow stems as a promising anticancer agent. Molecules. 2024;29(6):1377. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
